I want to take the opportunity to offer a broad view of my academic interests. Yes, that sounds tremendously boring. But I haven't done it anywhere else, and if you're a fellow grad student you may actually find this interesting.

Primary Research Interest (How do I spend the majority of my research efforts?)
I am interested in how immigration enforcement functions in non-border spaces. It's that simple and that complicated. It's a broad topic that draws on social and political theory, legal history, and site-specific field research. This is the substance of my MA thesis, and likely the focus of my future PhD dissertation, as well. I will be the most vague here, since it is the topic of ongoing research.

Secondary Research Interests (What other research am I willing to selectively spend time on?)
Geography & Deaf Studies: There are relatively few geographers who have the experience and language proficiency to connect deaf studies and geography. I am fascinated by the potential connections and contributions that have gone unnoticed due to the relatively little research overlap between these two fields. You'll notice that I'm organizing two sessions at the AAG on this topic. I find this a rewarding way to balance my interest in this topic and more pressing demand of the primary research.

Mobility and Cycling: Like the deaf studies, this is an intersection of personal and professional interest. Through my own experience of cycling for transportation, I have become interested in how mobility is invested with political, cultural, and personal meaning. This actually shows up in my research on immigration, but only a piece of the larger puzzle. I also help to keep Bike OSU going. (See http://bikeosu.weebly.com)

Tertiary Interests (These are the threads in my sweater that I just pick at from time to time.)
Project Management in Academia: After interpreting an excellent two-day seminar on project management, I realized that project management skills were just what I had been trying to develop over the past few years of organizing Bike to Work Week and other programs. I have since tried to apply bits and pieces of project management to my own studies in order to get (and stay) on track with my research. I am now kicking around the idea of how project management (P.M.) might contribute to improved research experience and outcomes, and whether P.M. is not an absolutely crucial but heretofore untaught skill for graduate students and career academics. 

Productivity and Performance in Academia: This is related to my first tertiary interest. I hesitate to mention these together, because it may seem like I'm trying to simply import business concepts. Not the case. I'm genuinely interested in how goals are set, measured, and achieved in a variety of settings: personal life, career life, and social life. I take the position that people generally accomplish what they set out to do. And most of the time, we set out to fail in some way – we just don't realize it because we aren't used to thinking clearly or communicating specifically. This brings up tertiary topic 2.1: writing and communication. I want to have an efficient writing process and produce clear writing products. Like P.M. above, I can't help but see writing as a core skill for academics. And like P.M., the writing process is almost completely untaught; it's expected that students will pick it up as they go along. Some of you may think that's fine. But think of where we've come with research methods. No one used to take research methods classes, and now they are seen as core skills (and required courses) for graduate students.

Relevant Pedagogy in Higher Education: Let's face it. If you are going to work at a university, you will have to teach. And unless you're at a liberal arts college, teaching will always be second to research. So, why bother being a good teacher? Primarily because initial investment in being a good teacher means lots of time saved down the road. Hence more time available for research. But it's more than that. Higher education can be anywhere between enlightening and life-changing, to irrelevant and mis-managed. It's just my opinion, but as a social scientist, I'm supposed to know something about how society functions, no? Even better if I can make a contribution to society, developing much-needed perspective in our undergraduate future leaders. What does all that mean, and how do we do that? I don't know. But I'm watching. And taking notes.
 
 
Update 2: Follow this link for the absolute best review of Scrivener for academic purposes.


Update: Read this excellent similar article about researchers giving up Word for Scrivener. Click here.

I like to write.
That is, I like what the writing process can do for me. Writing is one way –not 'the' way– to work through the tangle of ideas one accumulates by reading and doing research. As a first year graduate student, I am determined to 'front-load' my academic investment by figuring out early on how to write efficiently and skillfully. Few skills are as fundamental to an academic career as writing. 

It is an awful idea to start one's writing assignment with a blank Word document. The linear top-to-bottom layout and intimidating blank white screen gives me the heebie-jeebies. I much prefer to start with a large piece of paper, or better yet a whiteboard, and sketch out random thoughts as they come to mind, connecting them with an improvised network of lines and symbols. I write concepts on sticky notes and paste them on a wall, moving them around until they make sense. I will draw diagrams, flow charts, or pictures that represent ideas. I also free-write. A lot. I have attempted over the past few quarters to free-write after my classes for a few minutes, and after reading chunks of text. But even then, I use a stripped-down word processor (Apple TextEdit, for instance) instead of Word. The fewer formatting options the better. At some point I want to format my document. But I don't like those distractions to be there from the get-go. 

Enter Scrivener, my absolutely most favorite piece of non-Apple software I've ever bought. I came across this software while I was researching ways that writers organize their writing process. The software is designed for writing long documents, especially novels and screenplays. (I contend that academic writers have a lot to learn from novelists about the writing process.) 

Here are a five of my top 100 reasons why I love Scrivener. For a more complete independent review from 43 Folders, click here. To learn more about Scrivener from their website or to download a free trial, click here.

1. Write Non-linearly
In Word, you are bound by the top-to-bottom design of the document. In Scrivener, you can organize separate sections of text under a single heading (or separate headings) and work on them independently. This helps me to avoid the feeling that I have to write a complete introduction before talking about my methodology. It also allows me to write sections as I complete them, rather than waiting until I've finished all the research to begin writing a conclusion. Finally, it's easier to see the various connections between different parts of your document when they are not already in a linear fashion. And with Scrivener, if you want to rearrange your sections, you can do it easily and non-destructively.

2. Write from an outline – or vice versa
Outlines keep me on task and under control of the writing process. In Scrivener, you can create an outline and section summaries for you whole paper before you begin typing your text. Or you can type a bunch of text, and then organize it into sections. You can also reorder sections without copy and pasting. It's very flexible.

3. Keep multiple documents within reach
In Scrivener, when you want to start a new document, you don't have to ditch your scratch writing. All of you documents within a project stay in the left frame of your window. You can even open a split-screen to see your old ideas, or to view pdfs and images that jog your memory. The point is: no more flipping between three or four (or five or six) different document windows to find that big idea you had a month ago. 

4. Write now – Format later
There are very few formatting options in Scrivener. And all the writers in the audience say, "amen". Writing is about writing. Not about making it look fancy, which is what Word wants you to do. Scrivener also does not try to force your sentence to do things you don't want them to. Think: Word's pretentious Auto-formatting features. When you are done (or 99% done) with your document, you export it and format it in a proper word processor. (I suggest Apple's Pages over Word, but who am I.) 

5. Awesome cork board view
This is the most indulgent but practical feature in Scrivener. You can use the cork board view to start new ideas, write brief summaries and rearrange everything at will. And it looks like a real cork board. I think it's just swell.
Picture